(pdf)

Presented by
Etan Yeshua, JD, MSN, RN; VHC Health; Washington, DC
Emergency nurses often face ethical dilemmas in their interactions with law enforcement. One such dilemma arises when police order emergency nurses to forcibly catheterize a resisting arrestee in order to collect a urine specimen for the sole purpose of obtaining evidence of drug or alcohol use. Although the procedure is invasive and serves no medical purpose, police argue it could produce evidence to protect public health and safety by keeping dangerous drivers off the road. This presentation assesses the ethical implications of the practice for nurses through a review of clinical literature, state laws, and court cases. It concludes that the practice violates nurses’ principal ethical obligations to hold a patient’s welfare as our primary commitment and does little to promote public health and safety. Therefore, hospitals and professional nursing organizations should issue policies and position statements to clarify for nurses, judges, law enforcement officers, and legislators that internally catheterizing unwilling people for the sole purpose of obtaining urine samples as evidence for police is antithetical to the values of nursing.
Learner Objectives
Presenter
Etan
Yeshua holds a JD from Georgetown Law and an MSN from the Johns Hopkins
University School of Nursing. He worked as an attorney and regulatory
consultant in the pharmaceutical, medical device, and food industries
from 2011-2018, and he taught as an adjunct professor in that field at
Georgetown Law. Since 2018, he has worked in intensive care units in
the Washington, DC area - as an RN since 2021. He is a member of his
hospital's ethics committee and is particularly interested in nursing
ethics and end of life decision-making.